Should parents be kept in the dark as educators direct their children to LGBTQ groups and services?

This topic is good on its own. However, given this CSE guide’s context which conflates and champions pro-LGBTQ and pro-abortion beliefs as inalienable rights, coupled with a lax attitude towards pornography and casual sex.

12-15-year-old teenagers must list sources of help and support for sexual and reproductive health and rights issues. 

Does this list include pro-LGBTQ and pro-abortion sources? Given the beliefs of CSE, yes.

Teenagers must also describe good sources of “help and support”, including maintaining confidentiality and protecting privacy. 

Do parents have the right to know that their children are seeking certain sources of “help and support”?

15-18-year-old teenagers must know where to find assistance. Do these include pro-LGBTQ and pro-abortion services? From the beliefs of CSE, yes.

Teenagers must also have the attitude that they are entitled to services that maintain confidentiality. 

Should students be secretly sent to LGBTQ-affirming only services, against parental consent and family values?

If youths under the age of 18 are not allowed to drive and under 21 are not allowed to smoke cigarettes, why should they be removed from protection of their parents on issues that can have life-long impacts on them at ages lower than these?

Should schools undermine parent-child relationships, especially on matters as important as sexual health, behaviour, sense of self and morality? Or would you prefer parents to be closely involved in important matters such as this in an objective manner?

Stay Updated about CSE Harms

To be forewarned is to be forearmed.
No spam. No sales. Only Resources.


We are a group of volunteers pulling resources together to protect the next generation from sexualisation, gender ideology and gender confusion.